Visit the new AsenaTv Website

https://asenatv.com

Afwerki and Books – By Fetsum Abraham

Literacy or education at minimum gives one the ability to read and write and there is no doubt that President Afwerki is a literate or an educated man since he passes this test with flying

Literacy or education at minimum gives one the ability to read and write and there is no doubt that President Afwerki is a literate or an educated man since he passes this test with flying colors. He at least has finished high school education and even attended college in Ethiopia at probably a freshman or a sophomore level of the academic stratum.

My problem is with another issue related to the president: that I have heard quiet a few times that he has always been a good reader and the question is if this suggestion is true. Well, there is only one way of finding the answer: comparing his behavior to what scholars say about the qualities of a reader.
What does reading do to a person? “Reading enlightens your mind, broadens your horizon, expands your knowledge and opens up new avenues for you.” says someone in the INTERNET.
Another input states the following about the subject matter:
“Reading develops The Mind and helps to develop one’s listening ability which is very important to succeed in every aspect of life.” Afwerki scores very low in this litmus test because he would not have been in this entrapment had he been a listener. He would not have dictated at the bottom list of the universe and isolated himself and the nation as a result had he been a listener. Therefore, his attitude in this regard suggests that he does not read books.

“Reading develops One’s Creative Side: It is one of the best ways to give a creative orientation to one’s mind. It involves creative imaginations thereby promoting ingenious thinking.” Afwerki fails this test drastically because he has never been creative. He has no vision or any positive imagination that excites his people. He is in fact monotonous and boring because of lack of creativity. Therefore, his attitude in this regard suggests that he does not read books.

“Reading Expands Knowledge-Base: Irrespective of how much knowledge your mind can store, the scope to feed it with new things, always remain wide. A well-read person is a reservoir of knowledge as reading helps one to know about new things and analyze them in his/her own inventive way. The more you read, the more enlightened you are, and there is no denying the fact that ‘Knowledge is Power’. Gaining knowledge empowers you mind and broadens its range.” Afwerki terribly slides in this area because he does not know a lot. In fact, he does not understand the fundamental concept of ruling a society to the level of an ignorant. He would never have thought of ruling the country without law had he had the basic knowledge of social order. He would not have jailed people in mass without due trial had he been enlightened because such a person advocates human rights, compassion and tolerance which the president lacks to the point of a savage. He would not have cornered himself and the nation in this isolation had he had a broadened mind enhanced by reading. He would not have been a bully had he had a more civilized know-how to manage his emotions. He believes in violence because he has no knowledge. He is powerless upstairs the reason he can not deal with reason but rather with the power of the fist:  He does not even know what is going on and what he is doing at this point in his downfall because he has no knowledge assisted power. Simply speaking, he does not read to the point of IDIOCY.

“Reading Activates The Flow Of Ideas: Readers soon transform into a bubbling cauldron of fresh ideas. Active reading ignites your mind and arms it with new and creative ideas, which you can use in just about every aspect of your life. A dynamic flow of ideas also makes you an interesting person to be with as your mind is not static and you will always have something vital to contribute to every discussion.”
Afwerki miserable fails this test to be considered as a reader.  He is fixated, no new idea can generate from his static mind that refuses to conform to civility. He can not adapt to new environments because he is not a reader. He is boring and grudgy; that is all he has to show just because he has no knowledge tuned through the practice of reading.

“Reading Boosts Your Confidence: erudite people are confident since knowledge empowers your mind, a learned person knows that he maintains a slight edge over other people, no matter how talented they are. A well-read person is always oozing with confidence for “he/she knows”. Knowing things makes you feel self-assured and gives you the confidence to voice your opinions and be assertive about them.”: Only arrogance and rigidity characterize Afwerki and these qualities are reflections of a person who has no confidence on himself. Violence and control signify this poor president’s commonsense because he lacks confidence on himself. He is phobic to an educated mind because he does not learn from books to be like them.

In conclusion, reading enhances social skills, thus makes a reader understand society better. It enhances intelligence by exposing it to many schools of thought, thus making a reader tolerant and accommodating to different ideas and creativities.
Reading improves analytical thinking making one substantially objective on matters that concern society. It also helps one prioritize goals. All these positive entities are completely missing in Afwerki’s strange style of intelligence because the man is not naturally bright and does not read to improve his situation.  Afwerki lacks an academic mind to challenge the current problems of the country and does not depend on such minds to help him navigate the nation. Afwerki has no other knowledge besides one that directs him to remain a parasite of society for ever. He is so stupid he can not even learn from experience to change his ways: he has no civilized mind that invites different ideas to solve social problems. He is so low upstairs he thinks he owns the country and the people just like a toddler thinks of his environment. He does this absurdity more than what the least intelligent dictators of the likes of Amin did in history. Destructive and empty people like Afwerki can not lead a family let alone a nation. They can not go away peacefully either. Therefore, the focus of the struggle must shift from its tolerant approach to eliminating him as soon as possible.

aseye.asena@gmail.com

Review overview
31 COMMENTS
  • Abraham negassi January 28, 2013

    Dear fetsum, your articles are rich in educational point of view. I can see how resourful person your are. I am proud of you and others. You expose Afowerki in most earitrean way. I hope one day i will meet you in a Free Eritrea. One thing i tell, you are doing what educated person can do- the truth. You are not wasted educated dihard PFDJ loyalists.
    thank you

    • fetsum abraham January 28, 2013

      I hope one day I will see u at home too brother.

      • Salim January 29, 2013

        If you ask the former ambassador of Eritrea to China he will tell you that Issaias Afeworki Abraham indeed is a good reader.

  • matteroftime January 28, 2013

    Dear FUTSUM ERITREA GOT ONE A BRILLIANT PERSON,
    you are mindful eritrean , the situation in eritrea now will be become just only one job eliminating afowerkism and replacing eritrea to a democratic country.
    we eritreans we have to pay sucrification to save eritrea from mad dog. I am sure it will happen because I have been in ERITREA

  • Haile January 28, 2013

    I have never missed your articles. I would really like to recommend my compatriots to read all Fitsum’s articles. They broaden my knowledge and I always tell my friends to read them. Please please keep writing as much as possible. This is a very big contribution to the process of democracy.

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      thank u brother but i hope more people get active in this decisive moment of our country.

  • Halafi Mengedi January 28, 2013

    I don’t think Afeworki is stupid rather he is a shrewd tyrant who over the years have developed specific type of leadership skills. Just like pol pot, Stalin, Hitler and other tyrants, Afework has been able to effectively influence many high caliper individuals to achieve an ideological goal which is the establishment of a totalitarian government. Quite a few of these high caliper individuals have Phds such as Dr. Ghiorgish Ghebremicael.

    Hitler who is the most hated and cruel leader in history is believed to have been an avid reader. For example he is said to have written Mein Kampf,a book that details his political ideology. The problem is not whether one reads books rather its what type of books one reads that matters. In other words, one is what he reads. If you read spiritual books you tend to reflect spiritual characteristics. For instance, If you read “Das Capita”, “The communist Manifesto” and the likes , you would most likely show a totalitarian tendency if given the opportunity to govern a country.

    According T.W. Ryback “YOU can tell a lot about a person from what he reads. The surviving — and largely ignored — remnants of Adolf Hitler’s personal library reveal a deep but erratic interest in religion and theology ”

    Therefore, to conclude …all totalitarian leaders or all tyrants do not read books is not true. It is a fallacy of generalization from incomplete information. 😉

    • fetsum abraham January 28, 2013

      Interesting comment:
      U said “Afework has been able to effectively influence many high caliper individuals to achieve an ideological goal which is the establishment of a totalitarian government. Quite a few of these high caliper individuals have Phds such as Dr. Ghiorgish Ghebremicael.”

      I do not think Afwerki had the capacity to convince any one including the highly educated people you mentioned on something that did not originate from his mind because he did not invent the concept of totalitarianism.It was there for any one to either take or leave and they probably took it from there.

      You said that “Hitler who is the most hated and cruel leader in history is believed to have been an avid reader. For example he is said to have written Mein Kampf,a book that details his political ideology.”

      Hitler most probably should have been a reader because he was born in the most philosophically active environment of Europe in Germany.Reading was probably the norm of the German culture to have made him a reader. The fact that he wrote a book on his political philosophy it self suggests that he was an intellect at least to some extent. Afwerki’s case is different: he came from a culture that does not read as a norm and he was not intellect enough to put down his philosophy in writing even assuming he has one.

      you also said that “The problem is not whether one reads books rather its what type of books one reads that matters. In other words, one is what he reads. If you read spiritual books you tend to reflect spiritual characteristics. For instance, If you read “Das Capita”, “The communist Manifesto” and the likes , you would most likely show a totalitarian tendency if given the opportunity to govern a country.”

      I think you put this one convincingly. I agree with your statement although i think you can learn many things spiritually from evil books too.

      You also said that “Therefore, to conclude …all totalitarian leaders or all tyrants do not read books is not true. It is a fallacy of generalization from incomplete information.”

      Well said and well taken. I, however, did not give that impression by intention. The subject is too broad to conclude in my little article. What I mean is that Afwerki can not be a good reader for he does not seem to be one from his actions. He is too one dimensional and far behind for this time in universal experience. His attempt to completely dictate society according to his subjectivity tell me that he did not learn from others through reading, at least partially.

      TNX

      uwrioinrt

      t

      • Selam January 29, 2013

        Ato: Fetsum abraham You said
        “….Afwerki’s case is different: he came from a culture that does not read as a norm…”
        By virtue of your argument all Eritreans do not have a culture of reading therefore no one in Eritrea is avid reader. This is not true!!

        • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

          I take ur opinion positively though I differ from u a little in this regard.
          Tnx

    • Tekeste Gebrehiwot January 29, 2013

      I think the only time Afewrki ever read was when he was in high school and briefly until he be came the undisputed leader of the eplf .
      The books that he read are limited to marksism
      and leninism and may be mao tsetung.After he became the strong man of the eplf Afewrki was so taken away by his ego that he realy belived he had the capacity to run the world.If anybody knows Isayas he is a kind of person whose paranoid mind makes him feel that he is a better philosopher than Fransis Bacon,Thomas Hobes ,Adam Smith andthe rest added together.The problem that took us in a downhill trajectory is the in the first place his extreamly inflated ego.Issayas is a man who deep in his mind belives that he singel handely liberated eritrea and eritrea wouldnt be real without him at the helm.If there is any thing that Issaya does not posses is the ability to use his spare time to read .He is to disturbed in the mind to do so .he would rather knock him self out by drinkig than to deal with his disturbed mind and concentrate on reading.

      • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

        Brother Tekeste: great analysis. I agree with you fully and thank you for ur contribution.

  • jonah January 28, 2013

    Fetsum, I agree with most to content of article.
    I do think literacy is important. But I think it is just not reading but also critical thinking. For example, Meles went back to school after taking power fully knowing that running a guerrilla is completely different running a civil society. Also, Meles wasn’t welcomed as hero and was hated or despised by Amhara/Oromo elites. But he was able to transform his society and still work on his Master degree..
    http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/12/04/afraf.ads081.full?keytype=ref&ijkey=NBplmdUjEpY2AIv

    Issias on other hand came to Asmara as national hero, founding father, and liberator. We eritrean had no other leader to compare him with.. we had no Haile Sellasie, Mengustu, Meles as national leaders.

    As much as he likes to play the game of “no cult of personality”. For all practical purpose that is what we have in Eritrea. Issias hasn’t fully understood what it takes to make a successful civil society. He is not interested in doing that at all. His objective is transform the society into a “guerilla” movement that he spent 30 years running. Even if he wants to run a successful civil society, he doesn’t know or have a skill or education to do.. he will always rely on his guerilla tactics.

    Another thing about “knowledge is power” if that was case- well Librarians would be the most powerful. I believe that Applied knowledge is power. Not knowledge by itself.

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      Johna: Great contribution and thank u for ur input. U are absolutely right and what is missing in Afwerki is learned knowledge and knowledge gained from experience which u called applied knowledge if i understood u well. Our people may not be formally educated but they had the knowledge to maintain civility through applied knowledge gained from experience. You hit the mark in this regard and thank u.

  • Dawit Meconen January 28, 2013

    Knowledge can be applied to good or to bad. Those who apply kowledge to good can be likened to angels, the others to serpents. Isaias is from the second group. He is not ignorant. He knows what he is doing. The question, therefore, is not whether or not he has knowledge but to what end he is applying it. In short, what is his motive?

    We know the war with woyane could have been prevented and Eritreans could have been spared from all the tribulations they have been going through ever since; nor was the antagonism with the UNSC and USA necessary.

    Nevertheless, Isaias Afewerki, for reasons only known to himself , on his own volitions, without expressed will of the people, plunged them into this abyss in which they have been wallowing for the last fifteen years.

    However, the steep deterioration and degredation of our peoples’ living condition does not seem to bother Isaias Afewerki. On the contrary, he unashamedly gloats about that the over all situation is much better than any comparable countries in Africa. But again, if what he says were true, would the young Eritreans risk their lives fleeing their country in droves? Would the Olympic Eritrean National Athletes seek asylum in foreign land rather then return home? Would the National Eritrean Football Teams seek asylum in foreign land than return home?

    Isaias Afewerki knows very well with what is going on in Eritrea and the people of Eritrea. After all he is the author and executioner. But as he who poisons a person will not take him to a physician because the action will negate his intent, so Isaias Afewerki will not act or say anything that will nullify his evil intent on Eritrea and Eritreans.

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      Dear Dawit: thank you for the response and I agree with you fully. He could be a reader but it does not mean anything unless he learns from it. In any case, ur comment and ur observation relatively accurate. thanks

  • belay nega January 29, 2013

    fetsum

    1. YOU PLAYING CHAMELEON

    HOW DARE YOU FORGET YOUR ARTICLE IN WHICH YOU SAID P.E.A PLAID A decisive ROLE DURING THE ARM STRUGGLE.IF THAT THE CASE IT PROVES HE IS SELF MADE POLETICIAN AND GENERAL THROUGH READING.

    2. GIVE DEVIL HIS DUE

    DESPITE THE CONSEQUENCE OF HIS INTENTION HE IS THE LEADER OF E.P.L.F WHO CONTRIBUTED:
    ITS FAIR SHARE TO OVERTHROW HAILESELASSIE
    ……………………….MENGUSTU HAILEMARIAM
    WHO CONVINCED UN TO ALLOW REFERENDUM IN ERITREA
    WHO CHANGED THE MAP OF EAST AFRICA…..ETC

    3.YOU COPING P.E.A
    IN ONE OF YOU ARTICLE YOU SAID EVEN USA HAS NO POWER TO REVERSE OUR FREEDOM DO YOU THINK IS FAIR TO CALL YOU IGNORANT DUE TO THIS COMMENT? DON’T YOU KNOW IS ALREADY REVERSED BY VIOLETING THE FINAL AND BINDING DESICION OF THE BORDER LINE?
    AT LAST POINTING FINGERS IS NOT HELPFUL THE BEST WAY IS TO TELL OUR PEOPLE THE REAL CAUSE WE SUFFERING FROM AND LEAVE THE CHOICE…….

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      Belay: stick with ur reality and let me stick with mine. U can not be the only one who knows the truth and neither am I. Truth is not absolute as we humans deal with it: it is only relative and subjective. U have the right to conclude what ever u want to conclude. I think I have that right too, therefore we are ok.
      Tnx

  • g. ande January 29, 2013

    Hi Fitsum:

    I think your article is an oversimplification of the problem the country is having with Afeworki. Leo Tolstoy, in the epologue of his War and Peace book, has left me with one clue about dictators all my life. According to Tolstoy, tyrants, bad monarchs are in fact good students of social norms. That is, they study their environment and the dynamics of their society very carefully, and they design schemes that are most likely to be accepted or rather not notoriously opposed by the general public. Their schemes may not be benevolent but they some how try achieve for themselves what can possibly be achieved in a very sleazy way. They do not push things down the throat of their people. They give the people what they can swallow. So, Isayas did not become a tyrant by accident. The social dynamics of the Eritrean society and the Eritrean mentality allowed him to be so. Have you ever tried to discuss some contentious issue with a fellow Eritrean? Do not many discussions end up being “my way or the free way”. We are talking of the average person here. Eritrean society and culture is not accommodative to divergent views and we cannot blame that on Isayas. The only blame that can go his way in this regard is his selfish intent of capitalizing on the lack of “tolerance” in the general public to achieve his own selfish ends. About narrow mindedness and isolation, I believe that this anamoly is also very much present in the general public. Most Eritreans think they are superior to any race, African, Ethiopian, African-American and what have you even if they have very little to show for that. This attitude by itself is a recipe for disaster because it produces a great number of machos who Isays can tactically use for his own selfish ends. Eritrean Society is providing Isayas with loaded platter of norms to cook up his malice. Fitsum, don’t underestimate Afeworki. He is a shrewed person who knows his people. So, the fault is on the people who have embraced him for decades without posing on him any major challenge and not on him.

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      Hi g: thanks for the comment and I agree with u partially. Our culture certainly has a problem and I do not like the way deal with thins myself. we caused our own suffering at least partially and we are paying for it. We need a cultural revolution, I believe. I am about to write something about it and u came at the right time with a good point for me to put on.

      Thank you brother

  • Abraham Tewelde January 29, 2013

    Regarding Issaias I agree with you, and I find it appropriate; he wasn’t a good reader nor a lover of education.I don’t agree with you when you say that the good reading, study, broaden your horizons and your ability to critical and judgment faculties , the most striking example is Martin Heidegger,the great philosophers of last century, which despite his capacity he joined the nazionasocialismo, and Hanna Arendt in an interview said, “one can be a great professor of theorizing but having capacitance of political judgment equal to the common man.”

    So the study, research, reading is not sufficient to create antibodies against the animal instincts, and oppression, and not to mention Hobbes, but all of us conserve a little bit of that instincts.

    Ps. Your intellectual capacity should let you know that in Habesha culture we refer to someone by his name,Isseias and not with the name of the father Afewerki, this shows a difference between your cultural background and the nickname chosen by you. However, we welcome other cultures.

    • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

      Brother Abraham: ur comment is kool and I take it positvely. I, however, believe that reading for the most part expands ur horizon whether u use it positively or negatively.
      As for said Habesha culture, I can only tell that I respect it but do not have to follow it necessarily. Thanks for reminding me that though, and thank u for accepting my culture in this regard too.

  • Eri_free January 29, 2013

    Dear Fetsum Abraham

    I thank you for the impressive and explicit article you posted. As you clearly explained, I can not separate Afoworki’s mind and activities from a mad dog… “Destructive and empty people like Afwerki can not lead a family let alone a nation”. This is absolutly true, I always say and argue the above quotation with korakur (wekaru)hgdef. But the wekaru and korakur do not admit because they are silly and empty minded.

    • Eri_free January 29, 2013

      Let every body contribute and share his or her exprience in awaring what afeworkism look like.
      Accordingly we will win very soon.

      • fetsum abraham January 29, 2013

        Eri-free: U are correct in my opinion but I think we should not really suffer emotionally if we can control it. The damage done to our society is too gross to make us emotional but we need brilliant people like u, and the less emotional the better they can contribute. The HGDEfites are victims of insecurity and ignorance and we need to work on them modestly as long as they are not opportunists. As u said, we will make it soon and probably talk about all this in downtown Asmara with a nice Cappucino:
        Tnx

    • belay nega January 29, 2013

      ERI_FREE
      AS YOUR NAME INDICATE YOU ARE FREE ERITREA SO HOW DARE YOU UNDERMINE A PERSON WHO FULFILLED YOU DREAM? YOU HAVE ALL THE RIGHT TO CALL HIM DICTATOR…..ETC “can not lead a family” BELONGS TO THE WEB TIGERS WHO NEVER LIVE IN REALITY
      WHAT IS THE USAGE POINTING FINGERS TO A VICTIM LIKE ANY ERITREAN? WHY DO WE NOT ACCEPT OTHER FORCES ARE BEHIND ALL THIS CRISES AND WE ARE MOVING FROM BAD TO WORST? THIS IS HIGH TIME TO TELL OUR PEOPLE THE MAIN ISSUE WE SUFFERING FROM AND LEAVE THE CHOICE TO WHOM IT BELONGS

POST A COMMENT