South Sudan accuses Sudan of air strike on refugee camp
By Hereward Holland YIDA CAMP, South Sudan | Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:00pm EST (Reuters) - A refugee camp in South Sudan's Unity state was bombed Thursday, South Sudan officials and witnesses said, threatening to raise tensions
By Hereward Holland
YIDA CAMP, South Sudan | Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:00pm EST
(Reuters) – A refugee camp in South Sudan’s Unity state was bombed Thursday, South Sudan officials and witnesses said, threatening to raise tensions with Sudan in the violence-plagued border region.
Taban Deng, the governor of Unity state, accused Sudan of carrying out the attack. “These people (Khartoum) should be taken to book. They should adhere to international laws and regulations,” he told reporters in Bentiu.
Sudan’s armed forces denied they carried out the strike. In a statement before the bombing, South Sudan’s president Salva Kiir talked of Sudan’s “pending invasion” of its neighbor.
Violence along the poorly defined border since South Sudan’s independence in July has strained ties between the two former civil war foes. They have accused one another of backing rebel groups on their sides of the border.
A Reuters correspondent heard a large explosion in the Yida refugee camp, then saw a crater about two meters (6.6 feet) wide, an unexploded bomb wedged in the side of a school building and a white aircraft flying north. Witnesses said there were three further explosions at 3 p.m. (1200 GMT).
Yida is a camp of about 20,000 refugees from the Nuba mountains region of South Kordofan, a state north of the border where rebels have been fighting Sudan’s army since June. Khartoum reported fresh clashes in the state Thursday.
There were no immediate reports of any casualties at the camp, less than 25 km (15 miles) from the border with Sudan. A spokesman for the Enough Project, an activist group that works to end genocide, said the group confirmed there were no dead or wounded.
“The refugees need to be safe and need to be protected. They ran away from war. They should not be pursued inside the territory of South Sudan,” Deng, the governor, said.
Al-Sawarmi Khalid, spokesman for Sudan’s armed forces, said Sudan had not bombed anywhere in South Sudan’s territory. “South Sudan is a state in the United Nations. We respect international law, and it’s impossible that we would do that,” he said.
Khalid said Sudanese forces fought rebels in South Kordofan about five kilometers south of the town of Taludi Thursday, killing dozens and destroying a tank and other military vehicles.
Fighting has also broken out in Sudan’s Blue Nile state this year. The two states are home to tens of thousands of fighters who sided with the south during the war but were left in Sudan when South Sudan seceded, analysts say.
South Sudan split off into a separate country in July after voting overwhelmingly for secession in a January referendum, the culmination of a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of war between north and south.
VOLATILE BORDER
Fire crackled in the dry grass around the crater about 100 meters away from an aid agency compound in Yida camp.
“They (Khartoum) don’t want any life in the Nuba mountains, and now they are expanding the war to the South Sudan republic,” said Yousif Ismail, a refugee from the Nuba mountains, as he stood by the hole.
Last week, Khartoum submitted its second complaint to the U.N. Security Council, accusing South Sudan of supplying anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles, ammunition, landmines and mortars to insurgents in South Kordofan and Blue Nile states.
Kiir denied those claims in a statement Thursday, calling them “smoke screens to mask Khartoum’s own activities in support of the armed dissident groups that are fighting its proxy war against the Republic of South Sudan.”
The accusations were being used to justify Sudan’s “pending invasion of the South,” Kiir said.
The two countries have yet to agree on how much the new nation will pay to use Sudan’s oil pipelines and other facilities, which South Sudan depends on to export crude. They also dispute control of the Abyei region.
Some 2 million people died in the north-south civil war, waged for all but a few years since 1955 over religion, ideology, ethnicity and oil.
(Additional reporting by Khalid Abdelaziz and Louis Charbonneau; Writing by Alexander Dziadosz; Editing by Robert Woodward and Matthew Jones)
Zekhtam Eritrawi November 10, 2011
Let me digress for a bit. I am still laughing. I just finished reading a part one piece. In fact, I will call it a comic mini book where the title is rather stern and serious, “The Atrophied Deny Their Atrophy: Part 1”. It is published on Awate.com a new article after practically one week in a repose. I just laughed all the way through the article. I actually felt like I was heading home from an evening at a comedy club. Oh I almost forgot, it is written by the prolific Salih AA (sounds like a defaulted credit history) Younis.
Kozami November 11, 2011
Zekhtam Eritrawi pt1
anta entay gebernaka nezi me’eseri zeyblu halowlow kenenbib zerasenkana…wey gud, n adgi zeykebedo’s n’teyqi y’kebdo eyu negeru!
His whole second rate none sense could have been summarized as: He thinks GoE sucks, He thinks the UN will impose the sanction regardless, He thinks PIA would fail to convince the UNSC even if he gets to address them. He rants on and on huffing and puffing about grammar and typos that he laboriously and insults the reader by trying to illustrate the obvious. Little does he know that there is a lot of controversial political stands taken on grammar vis a vis non native speakers, both at western institutions of higher education and political circles.
Kozami November 11, 2011
Zekhtam Eritrawi pt2
It suffices to remind him that a paragraph is made up of sentences that introduce and then expand on it before moving to the next paragraph. In his case, his paragraphs, for most part, straddle across one another starting with the conjunction ‘but’, ‘so’, ‘because’…(his sub section on under “general observations” is replete with such poor penmanship). His loose canon blubbering aside, he neither shed any light as to corroborate the SMG forge to serve hidden agenda nor challenged Eritrea’s stand that Nothing has been presented to claim it has violated the terms of UNSC res.1907. To his dismay however, the first key consideration now being considered by the UNSC is the credibility of the report (according to the latest UN reporting). What a pity to see a talent go down the drain!
Kozami November 11, 2011
please read ‘laboriously unearths’ … and also a paragraph…’introduces an idea’…thx
tegadalay November 11, 2011
iam suprise ASSENA dont put eritrea name in this bombing in SAUTH SUDAN what happen this was good propoganda if you want to put ERITREA IN AFIRCA AS PROPLEM MEYBE nobody not belive all this propoganda