Eritrea appeals to UN in bid to prevent sanctions
UNITED NATIONS, Nov 8 – Eritrea’s president has asked for a personal hearing before the UN Security Council in a bid to head off new sanctions over alleged support for Somalia’s Islamist rebels, diplomats said. Rival
UNITED NATIONS, Nov 8 – Eritrea’s president has asked for a personal hearing before the UN Security Council in a bid to head off new sanctions over alleged support for Somalia’s Islamist rebels, diplomats said.
Rival Ethiopia has been calling for tougher action against Eritrea for several months after its neighbor was linked to a plot to bomb an African Union summit in Addis Ababa.
Kenya is now accusing Eritrea of arming Somali Islamist rebels and UN Security Council members Nigeria and Gabon have tabled a resolution calling for sanctions on Eritrea’s mining industry and remissions from abroad.
Eritrea’s President Issaias Afeworki has asked to speak to the 15-nation Security Council in New York in a move opposed by the United States.
Some Western nations oppose new sanctions, fearing such restrictions could harm the civilian population, diplomats said.
Afeworki has denied Kenya’s accusations that his country arms Shebab rebels in Somalia and that it was involved in a plot, outlined in a UN sanctions committee report, to bomb the summit in the Ethiopian capital in January.
The Security Council has not yet formally replied to the president, but diplomats said the United States and other council members feared that his presence at a meeting would only increase tensions.
“If Afeworki is at a meeting, then how could we stop the leaders of Ethiopia and other countries coming,” one Western diplomat said.
The United States has in the past spoken out in favor of new sanctions.
But envoys from other members of the council say action against mining — the mainstay of Eritrea’s tiny, crippled economy — would only harm the country’s five million people.
No date has yet been set for a meeting on Eritrea, but the six-nation Inter-Governmental Authority on Development, an East African regional bloc, is stepping up pressure for a decision, diplomats said.
The draft resolution calls on all states to “prohibit investment” in Eritrea’s key mining industry and ban the imports of gold and other resources from Eritrea, according to a copy of a draft resolution seen by AFP.
The action would also seek to ban the collection of a two percent tax on money sent home by Eritreans abroad.
In December 2009, the Security Council imposed an arms embargo, travel restrictions and asset freezes on Eritrean leaders for their alleged support to Shebab in the civil war against Somalia’s Western-backed transitional government.
Eritrea’s Foreign Minister Osman Saleh said in a letter to the Security Council last week that giving Ethiopia and “other powers that harbor belligerent intentions” the right to inspect any cargo heading for Eritrea “is fraught with dangerous security implications.”
Action against the mining industry would “cripple future economic growth,” said the minister.
He went on to slam the travel ban against officials as a bid to “reinforce the image of a ‘pariah state’ that Eritrea’s enemies have been peddling.”
AFP
Semhar November 8, 2011
UN Security Council should put new sanctions to the dictator and his regime in Eritrea.
UN Security Council should help the Eritrean people to get reed the dictator just like they did in Libya.
HGDF November 8, 2011
Hey you should first start the fighting on your own and then see if the “UN” could help you. This was what happened in Libya. They didn’t get help while they were sitting and writing on PC’s they bought from Adey Amete money. You guys are looking for something like “Zeysinika hutsa Kortumelu”. You want the poor people in Eritrea to be persuaded by your bla blas and take wrong actions. I could have believed all you say if you were in Eritrea taking some actions and telling people to follow you. What you are doing now is nothing but confusing people.
kozami November 8, 2011
HGDF
I think you are talking to a ‘program’ not a ‘person’ This ‘program’ has been populating the comments section with two or three types of pre-formated text object at a regular cycle. I thought I would share this with you because I couldn’t help but lough noticing you yelling at the ‘machine program’ and not a person.
HGDF November 8, 2011
I believe all the Eritreans on the opposition internet sites are just talking machines. So you could be right that I am just talking to talking machines. But I believe also that I am writing not only to those who write whether it is a person or a machine, but also to reader who I belive are wiser than those who write.
HZGDF November 8, 2011
HGDF maaltika keriba eya zela meninetka traH axariy kemto goytaka ayte issayas wedi xomakit suka AGAME keytikewun…
Kibrom T. November 9, 2011
To the sophists above,
1. If you really think you are talking to a “program”, why bother commenting on this site?
2. You will not admit your sophistry has no end. The UNSC is not just a “program”. It is cinching the noose around your boss’s neck and he is begging it not to. And you two are still shouting, “Noose? What noose?”.
3. Let me remind you once more: A real dictator (like your boss) will go down fighting the wrong fight until they drag him out of a rat hole…Pol Pot, Saddam, Gaddafi, Hitler…
4. We do not have to imitate Libya to get rid of him and silence you. There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Abreham November 8, 2011
Sanctions against any source of hard currency is acceptable but action similar to Libya will be difficult propose.
Abreham November 8, 2011
Sanctions against any source of hard currency is acceptable but action similar to Libya will be difficult to propose.
Abrahaley ETiDine November 8, 2011
Sanctions to the dictator will help Isayas to have a feel to the rule of law on the planet earth. Sanction will help Eritrea and its ppl. If you don’t believe this will help the Dictator make an attempt to come to the UN. Mr. D is funny he still believes in personalities not instutions.
Teazabi November 8, 2011
I was wandering about Eritrean government. When Ethiopia enter Somalia to distroy Al shabab, the eritrean government was very angry and leave IGAD because of that. They always support al shabab . when Kenya enter to somalia for the same reason, They said “we don’t oppose the invation of Kenya to enter Somalia” Are they saying Ethiopia does not have right to enter Somalia but for Kenya no problem. What are they thinking ( This is big insult for Ethiopia)
HGDEF November 9, 2011
Ethiopia didnt go to Somalia to destroy Alshebab. The went there to remove Sheik Sherif whom the made president later.
HGDEF November 9, 2011
Kenyas intervention is not politically motivated like the Weyanes. Ethiopia has historical conflict and must also obey the order of their boss the US. Kenya is just frustrated with the kidnappings.
Mike November 8, 2011
Eritrean regime deserves a strict sanction not only on its role in destabilizing the region, also on the suffering of Eritreans by the repressive regime.The Issayas regime is not different than the Gadaf’s regime, infact it is worst.
I hope the UN security council understands that, and should not expect to get new information by calling Issayas to the UN.
If Issayas is called to the UN, what he will say is IT IS ALL LIES. The regime is in a state of denial. So,what is the use of calling them. It is only wasting your TIME.
Almaz November 8, 2011
NiHayal Hayal alowo. This is the result of the the cruel regime’s pride. TEBIT TIKIDIMA NIWIDKET. The wild beasts led by the blood thirsty mad man should ripe what they saw. DEM NAY BEAL MEHAMMED SHERIFO, OKBE ABRHA…. all youngsters shot along the borders of the country and in side….DEA MEAS DEM NAY KELBI KOYNU.
The fate of the dictator will not be different that his friends KAZZAFI and MUBAREK.
There is time for every thing.
truly, Truly i say to you November 8, 2011
There is no a need of prevention. We know the first The socalled “smart sanction” hasn´t functiond practically. this new one also will be not different.But as i said before, the purpose of the talk about sanction is, because the mining companies and their power full nations know the more pfdj scares to his power they know pfdj the more will be enforcing to comprome to deal the mine cheaply with them,or it could be an enforcing destructing psychological manoeuvre pfdj not to change or stop its idea from sealing mine cheaply, that has already began, or to restrain pfdj not to compromise deal with other cheap companies,or the more pfdj scare for its power the more will be ready to invest the money to buy weapon, so that other companies indirectly to get it back the money what the pfdj got from mining. That is the way to take back the poor mind 3rd world Africans wealth. To hold nations hostage because of disobedience is a big knowledge like it is written in the scripture, “How great is are God´s riches! How deep are his wisdom and knowledge,Who knows the mind of the Lord?”( Romans 11; 32- 33)
COMEBESHTATO November 8, 2011
i think this precident has to leave eritria or nato got to help eritrian peopple juest like they did in libiya.but there is a problem in eritria . there is no peopple . eritrian peopple is not like libiyan peopple.so sanction only is not good enought .what they need to do is (NATO) like libiya ,military action.good luck for every one but eritrian government.
HZGDF November 8, 2011
arkeey there is nobody in eritrea. kula zerita adi gedifa eya tahadim zela.
danielwoldu November 8, 2011
tough sanction to dictater isaias and regime change in eritrea i would be happy if the sanction imposed and get reed the narow mind n kill him then we can get back our beloved country live peace