Visit the new AsenaTv Website

How Ethiopia and Eritrea can forge a new relationship

BY HERMAN J. COHEN Four key issues that will need to be resolved for the neighbours to normalise relations. In 1991, as the US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, I led peace talks between Ethiopia and


Four key issues that will need to be resolved for the neighbours to normalise relations.

In 1991, as the US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, I led peace talks between Ethiopia and Eritrean separatists. The negotiations ended a nearly thirty-year war and established Eritrea as an independent state.

These outcomes were a geopolitical success, but they did not resolve the bitter acrimony between the two countries. And since that moment, the relationship between these neighbours has been frozen in hostility. It has included a 1998-2000 border war, shadowy intelligence efforts, and accusations of tacit support for rival militant groups. Both sides have maintained a heavy and expensive military presence along their border, and a once vigorous economic relationship has totally dried up.

Yet a détente may finally be emerging, driven by the arrival of a new Prime Minister in Addis Ababa, Abiy Ahmed. On 6 June, the Ethiopian government announced it would finally implement the 2000 Algiers Agreement, an internationally sponsored peace treaty and border demarcation signed by Ethiopia and Eritrea.

“All that we have achieved from the situation of the last 20 years is tension,” Abiy later remarked. “We need to expend all our efforts toward peace and reconciliation and extricate ourselves from petty conflicts and divisions, and focus on eliminating poverty.” The prime minister referred to Ethiopians and Eritreans as “brotherly peoples” and expressed hopes for “economic ties between Asmara and Addis Ababa”.

The centrepiece of this move is the highly symbolic town of Badme, a disputed territory which Ethiopia illegally occupied in 1998, sparking the border war. As part of the peace agreement, a Hague commission declared Badme part of Eritrea, but Ethiopia never accepted this decision and continued to occupy the town.

Ethiopia’s pledge to cede Badme to Eritrea is therefore deeply momentous. Eritrea has consistently stated that all issues would be on the table for negotiation as soon as Ethiopia withdrew from Badme, a symbol of Eritrean resentment since the last war ended in 2002.

This means that, in theory, the door is now open for bilateral discussions. It is hard to overstate how positive a friendly relationship between Ethiopia and Eritrea could be for the region, which has been dogged by poverty, famine, and insecurity.

It is too early to say if and when such talks could be held, but these are the key issues that would need to be resolved as priorities for the partnership to move forwards.

1) A mutual security guarantee

Since the end of the war in 2000, Ethiopia and Eritrea have accused each other of supporting “opposition groups”, both armed and unarmed. It is difficult to confirm or deny their allegations, but it is clear that the first order of business should be a mutual security guarantee. Both governments should agree not to allow their territories to be used for hostile activity and pledge to reduce their military forces along the border by 80%.

The two defence establishments could then begin discussions on joint actions against “jihadist” militants threatening the security and stability of both Ethiopia and Eritrea.

2) Re-opening the border for trade

Prior to the war, Ethiopia and Eritrea enjoyed what was essentially a common market. Cross-border trade flowed freely, with neither tariff nor non-tariff barriers. Eritrea’s introduction in 1997 of its own currency, the Nakfa, made cross-border trade more complicated, but had little impact on commerce. Ethiopia’s later insistence that cross-border trade be conducted in US dollars created an additional impediment.

The two governments should now declare that the border will re-open to commerce with no barriers. To overcome the inhibiting factor of US dollar trade financing, the governments can jointly request that the International Monetary Fund establish a currency-clearing mechanism allowing businesses to pay for goods in either country’s local currency. The IMF has established several such mechanisms in other regions of the world.

3) Restoring access to the ports

Prior to the war, Ethiopia had full access to the Eritrean ports of Assab and Massawa. Ethiopia had its own customs facility in Assab where they cleared imports destined for its markets. All of this was interrupted by the war. After Eritrea gained independence in 1993, Ethiopia became landlocked and had to rely exclusively on the railroad from Addis Ababa to the port of Djibouti, bypassing Eritrean territory.

There is no reason why the normalisation discussions could not arrange for a restoration of Ethiopia’s access to Eritrea’s two ports. An existing high-quality road from Massawa port to Ethiopia could serve northern Ethiopia. The Assab port meanwhile is relatively close to the capital Addis Ababa.

Under such an arrangement, Eritrea would gain revenue from Ethiopian rental payments. Ethiopia would gain more efficient movement of imported merchandise and aid. In addition, Ethiopia would no longer have to rely exclusively on the distant port of Djibouti and the less-than-reliable railway connection.

4) Removing sanctions against Eritrea

The UN Security Council imposed sanctions on Eritrea in 2011 based on some weak evidence of its alleged support for al-Shabaab militants in Somalia. Since the allegations against Eritrea are now old and there is no evidence of recent activities, it would be appropriate for Ethiopia and the US to jointly sponsor a resolution in the Security Council to lift these sanctions.

The new regime in Ethiopia has brought fresh hope of a healthy and stable relationship with Eritrea. The two governments undoubtedly have additional issues they will want to raise during discussions. But if they start with those above, they will be well on their way to a win-win outcome.

Review overview
  • Michael Tesfamariam June 15, 2018

    Assenna loves copy and paste of articles without sources. You did not even provide the name or identity of the writer so your viewers can have some clue who this white man is in the first place. This man is one of the few but important voices of HGDEF in Washington, he launched a think tank firm right after the Ethio Eritrea border war erupted and since then he has been serving as the mouthpiece of the regime in Eritrea. Assenna is now feeling proud of using Herman Cohen as credible expert of Ethio Eritrea issue. This is the man who has left no unturned stone to pursuade the State Department to change their position against Eritrea,especially to lift the sanctions that has been imposed for illigal activities the regime was engaged, and has nothing to do with the border issue. He now wants to appear as peace maker while he spent his retire time kissing Issais’s ass and his organised mafia regime.

  • Simon G. June 15, 2018

    This guy is making money out of idiot Eritreans.
    Eritrea is in this situation because of people like this evil man. He never accepted Independent Eritrea and he is the lobby for HGDF. What does it tell us about HGDF and their followers?
    He is now saying kick off any opposition from both countries and dictators can leave in peace and he and his friends can make a lot of money from these poor nations.
    He was advising isayas not push for independence in 1991.
    Wow, how idiot are we?
    Are we this low?
    Stupid people deserves to be enslaved. Shame on us.

  • rezen June 15, 2018

    Subject: “How Ethiopia and Eritrea can forge a new relationship” by former US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, dated July 14, 2018

    Commentary, 14 June 2018 is an open, free Eritrean website that accommodates and provides space for opinions from all quarters for the primary benefit for Eritrea but also, in tandem, for better relationship with its neighbours — in particular with Ethiopia for obvious fundamental historical reason. Consequently, needless to say, any opinions emanated from any quarter need to be appreciated, with clear understanding that the final decision rests upon the two fraternal Nations for common benefit..

    Now, It goes without saying that the respective Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have, not only moral reason, but OBLIGATION to their respective people to get together and come-up with a solution for a peaceful and permanent fraternal relationship. This is a MUST., and absolutely crucial It is also a MUST that the solution be FORGED by indigenous EXPERTS in ALL fields of profession, as necessary. It should be emphasized at all times that It is the problem of the two countries and the solution must be created and owned by the two countries, for their own benefits. If Eritrea and Ethiopia are incapable of handling their LIFE, then the meaning of Liberty & Freedom, have absolutely no meaning. THE END

  • meretse June 15, 2018

    I wish Mr. Choen was a peace loving person unfortunately, he had never been. His record proves he is the godfather of DIA. The people of Eritrea and Ethiopia would be better off if keeps his mouth shut

  • Sami June 18, 2018

    Herman Cohen is paid lots of money to lobby for Eritrean regime. He sold his soul to the devil.